donate
PGnet home | Advertise | Donate | Contact | free classifieds
New here? Register now and join in with the most vibrant re-enactor community on the web.

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 112
Location: Wet,Windy Wales
What with all the excitement of the new FJ helmets available ive just been looking through a FJ book and was amazed at what appears to be the various different shapes in shells so begs the question of who can claim at least that their shells are THE BEST-what were they judged/copied from.

I am holding my hands up now in that i have never handled or even seen an original shell in my life but am just curious as to how someone can claim that XXXX brand is the best and XXXX is rubbish etc?

In the 1st pic the helmets look shallow-sort of like the HK/Chinese repros-not much of a turn up at the brow.

2nd pic helmets look deeper and in the 3rd pic the helmet appears to have a more distinct flare to the rim??

Image

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 12:11 pm
Posts: 52
Location: Boston Massachusetts
telemark,

Your observations are valid...There are different shapes regarding original helmets mainly with the tapered front side to brim area. Also to the front brim many originals have a distinct "dip" in them. Some dip more than others and some appear to be straight accross. The very late ckl's sometimes have an outward flange completely around the shell (rare).
Like in all manufacturing that require dies...Dies wear out and break which require others to be made. This would lead to the minor differences observed between originals. The rolled rim process was finished "by hand", so this too would cause variations in their shape.
What does not vary is the quality of the rolled rim, steel thickness and weight. Most of the reproductions use an 18 gauge steel which is thinner than the originals and display horrible rolled rims.

Lastly...What sets apart a good reproduction from a bad one is the liner and straps. This is where the Chinese and Indian examples fail.

Mike


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 112
Location: Wet,Windy Wales
BPatronen wrote:
telemark,

Your observations are valid...There are different shapes regarding original helmets mainly with the tapered front side to brim area. Also to the front brim many originals have a distinct "dip" in them. Some dip more than others and some appear to be straight accross. The very late ckl's sometimes have an outward flange completely around the shell (rare).
Like in all manufacturing that require dies...Dies wear out and break which require others to be made. This would lead to the minor differences observed between originals. The rolled rim process was finished "by hand", so this too would cause variations in their shape.
What does not vary is the quality of the rolled rim, steel thickness and weight. Most of the reproductions use an 18 gauge steel which is thinner than the originals and display horrible rolled rims.

Lastly...What sets apart a good reproduction from a bad one is the liner and straps. This is where the Chinese and Indian examples fail.

Mike



Thanks for the info Mike-interesting.

Yep i had gathered myself from looking at various repros that the liners and straps can vary from the God awfull to passable but again i stress about never seeing an original to compare.

I was lucky enough a few years ago to buy a G Max helmet which i believe at the time for both the shell and components were regarded as the best available.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 11:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 9:30 am
Posts: 980
Location: South Coast
I might be stating the obvious but the second and third pics above are of reenactors? Can't tell from your first post whether you are positing these as example of actual wartime variations or not?

Middle pic is Tom G on here (in the specs) and bottom pic is Sean S. from KP1's FJ group.

_________________
David

Stimme aus dem sumpf...

STURMPANZER ABTEILUNG


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 8:20 pm
Posts: 2777
Location: Afra
lol dave,

thanks for the compliment :) they are original pics. The middle one is a famouse picture in normandy ( shows them using captured weapons) and the bottom pic is of a propaganda crew as the guy behind the front guy with the beretta is holding a foook of camera :)

Tom


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 112
Location: Wet,Windy Wales
Pug42 wrote:
I might be stating the obvious but the second and third pics above are of reenactors? Can't tell from your first post whether you are positing these as example of actual wartime variations or not?

Middle pic is Tom G on here (in the specs) and bottom pic is Sean S. from KP1's FJ group.


Pics are ALL originals.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 9:30 am
Posts: 980
Location: South Coast
That guy is a dead spit for you Tom! :D

So reincarnation does exist... :shock:

_________________
David

Stimme aus dem sumpf...

STURMPANZER ABTEILUNG


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:41 pm
Posts: 5801
Location: TAMPERE FINLAND
Pug42 wrote:
That guy is a dead spit for you Tom! :D

So reincarnation does exist... :shock:

If I had not seen the the photo before I would of said the same

_________________
ImageImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

*webmaster temp testing**

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group