True effectiveness of SS units?
-
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 7:23 pm
Re: True effectiveness of SS units?
gvb with the stugs at carentan?
in the last 10 years loads of groups have maybe got bigger.
in the last 10 years loads of groups have maybe got bigger.
-
- Posts: 661
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 6:28 pm
Re: True effectiveness of SS units?
In Part 5 'Crossroads' Captin Winters and easy company come across a few hundred SS mean close to a river crossing.Mikkel wrote:The huge SS reenactment group used in SVP, existed long before that movie.
If you were right, all the current ss units have been formed post '98.
besides, I don't recall more than a few ss soldiers in BoB (apart from the polish "volunteers" they gun down in one episode)?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUS_Khee ... re=related
Re: True effectiveness of SS units?
Those are the polish "volunteers" i mentioned.
- Casbah Rock
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 6:13 pm
- Location: Essex
Re: True effectiveness of SS units?
Just watched the clip and bloody Yanks not taking their hits whilst all the Germans take their shots - somethings never change !
SS-Rottenführer Kotzur
Zweite Kampfgruppe
1. SS Pz. Div. Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler
Meine Ehre Heißt Treue
Zweite Kampfgruppe
1. SS Pz. Div. Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler
Meine Ehre Heißt Treue
- Crazy Feldgendarme
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 7:46 pm
- Location: Telford
Re: True effectiveness of SS units?
Ermm thread is not about Band of Brothers or Saving Private Ryan gents keep it on track please.
May the fleas of a thousand camels infest the crotch of the person who screws up your day and may their arms be too short to scratch.
GeFoPo
GeFoPo
-
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 7:23 pm
Re: True effectiveness of SS units?
no you are are right, please feel free to bum me again oooohhhh.
sailor.
sailor.
-
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 7:23 pm
Re: True effectiveness of SS units?
read "Hot motors-cold feet" by Helmut Gunter, its a personal account of a kradmelder from "reich" in russia, he was with Klingenberg a small "crow" that done a little bit.
Units from history must be judged on results and what objectives they won, i would say that the waffen ss were "elite" and held their own on all fronts, yes there were lesser formations and some less than honorable units that come under the "ss" unberella, but charkov for instance has won the waffen ss undying fame as an elite formation, the fighting in normandy also-we have a british ww2 veteran in our group and he fought the waffen ss in normandy and he wears their uniform at events, he is 85 and he thinks their elite!
judge the units on what they achieved and the waffen ss achieved a lot!
"elite" is a word used far to much by reenactors, as pretending to be in an elite unit is one thing but fighting in or against one is something completely different.
Units from history must be judged on results and what objectives they won, i would say that the waffen ss were "elite" and held their own on all fronts, yes there were lesser formations and some less than honorable units that come under the "ss" unberella, but charkov for instance has won the waffen ss undying fame as an elite formation, the fighting in normandy also-we have a british ww2 veteran in our group and he fought the waffen ss in normandy and he wears their uniform at events, he is 85 and he thinks their elite!
judge the units on what they achieved and the waffen ss achieved a lot!
"elite" is a word used far to much by reenactors, as pretending to be in an elite unit is one thing but fighting in or against one is something completely different.
Re: True effectiveness of SS units?
I think to simply say that the SS were “elite” is nothing more than a mere generalisation a sweeping statement. The SS did achieved many victories true, but did others not?
Ernst
Ernst
-
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 7:23 pm
Re: True effectiveness of SS units?
You are all correct they was actually rubbish, achieved nothing and its all propaganda
all those books about hill 112 are all made up, that bridge at rostov was a swing bridge and no could find the key, charkov was actually a "butlins holiday camp" for red army reenactors and the real reason it took about 8 weeks to take caen was the Hj division would not let the canadians past until they explained why they lived next door to the americans surrounded by the french?
elite is not a magazine collected in binders in the nineteen eighties you know.
yawn.
all those books about hill 112 are all made up, that bridge at rostov was a swing bridge and no could find the key, charkov was actually a "butlins holiday camp" for red army reenactors and the real reason it took about 8 weeks to take caen was the Hj division would not let the canadians past until they explained why they lived next door to the americans surrounded by the french?
elite is not a magazine collected in binders in the nineteen eighties you know.
yawn.
Re: True effectiveness of SS units?
Most SS divisions were extremely capable fighting units and many were elite that is not in dispute. However the thing that gets me is the constant over representation of the SS. That’s all. From were I am sitting every man and his dog is in the LSSAH. Well I guess the same goes for Heer and all the units doing GD or all the FJ’s I guess people are just attached to these "elite" formations. Ignore me I am going back to my corner.
Ernst
Ernst
-
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 7:23 pm
Re: True effectiveness of SS units?
In reenacting you can be whatever you want, i want to be (as i have allready stated) Smurfett!
Brigadefuehrer your first ooooooooohhhhhhh.
Seriously history shows the waffen ss premier divisions as elite, there is nothing we can do to change history, dont confuse reenactment groups with the real units (god help us all)
Brigadefuehrer your first ooooooooohhhhhhh.
Seriously history shows the waffen ss premier divisions as elite, there is nothing we can do to change history, dont confuse reenactment groups with the real units (god help us all)
Re: True effectiveness of SS units?
The worrying thing is that out there somewhere there is probably somebody who does have a little smurf getup.ssparatrooper wrote:In reenacting you can be whatever you want, i want to be (as i have allready stated) Smurfett!
Ernst
Re: True effectiveness of SS units?
That's why we do the TK portrayment!Ernst wrote:the thing that gets me is the constant over representation of the SS. That’s all. From were I am sitting every man and his dog is in the LSSAH.
Ernst
As for an "elite" group, if there is such a thing,
the Totenkopf are listed as having the third most
awarded "R-K's" in the German Military of WW2.
Also nobody else as far as i know portray this Unit
in the UK
Peiper.
-
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:56 pm
Re: True effectiveness of SS units?
But part of the point of TK is that they were NOT an elite unit until later in the war. TK suffered heavily at the hands of the British in France 1940, and didn't really pick up any kind of elite status until the Demjansk battle.Peiper wrote:That's why we do the TK portrayment!Ernst wrote:the thing that gets me is the constant over representation of the SS. That’s all. From were I am sitting every man and his dog is in the LSSAH.
Ernst
As for an "elite" group, if there is such a thing,
the Totenkopf are listed as having the third most
awarded "R-K's" in the German Military of WW2.
Also nobody else as far as i know portray this Unit
in the UK
Peiper.
Re: True effectiveness of SS units?
Thanks for clarifying that WernerRudyWerner wrote:
But part of the point of TK is that they were NOT an elite unit until later in the war. TK suffered heavily at the hands of the British in France 1940, and didn't really pick up any kind of elite status until the Demjansk battle.
I was referring to the TK's status at the end of the War,
and what as an SS Division they were regarded as.
Cheers Peiper